pre launch9 min read

Restaurant viability: 7 numbers before you sign the lease

Seven numbers to validate before signing a restaurant lease: break-even covers, rent load, prime cost, capex payback, and aggregator dependency.

By Forkcast Editorial · HORECA research team

The lease is the most irreversible decision in a restaurant opening. Everything after it — menu, staff, marketing — can be changed. Rent, deposit, and location cannot. Seven numbers, calculated before you sign, separate viable sites from expensive mistakes.

The seven numbers

#NumberHow to calculateRed flag threshold
1Monthly break-even revenueFixed costs ÷ contribution margin %>1.8× expected month-3 revenue
2Daily break-even coversDaily break-even ₹ ÷ AOV>85% of peak-hour capacity
3Rent loadMonthly rent ÷ expected revenue>12% for casual dining
4Prime cost at target volumeFood % + labour % at month-6 covers>58% for casual dining
5Capex payback periodTotal capex ÷ monthly net profit at steady state>36 months
6Aggregator dependencyAggregator revenue ÷ total revenue (projected)>45% without dine-in plan
7Working capital runwayCash available ÷ monthly fixed cost<2.5 months

Number 1: monthly break-even revenue

Add rent, salaries, utilities, EMI, insurance. Divide by contribution margin (1 minus variable cost rate). If break-even is ₹6L and you realistically expect ₹4L in month 3, you need 18+ months of subsidy — or a different site.

Number 2: daily break-even covers

Divide daily break-even revenue by your expected AOV. If you need 120 covers/day and your peak-hour kitchen capacity is 100, you have a structural problem. Casual dining at 60 seats typically caps at 180-220 covers/day across lunch and dinner.

Number 3: rent load

Rent above 12% of projected revenue for casual dining is the single strongest predictor of year-one failure. Mumbai Bandra at ₹3.5L rent needs ₹29L+ monthly revenue to stay under 12%. Most new outlets hit ₹12-18L in month 6.

Number 4: prime cost at target volume

Model food cost and labour cost at month-6 covers, not opening week. Labour cost % is higher at low volume. A roster that works at ₹8L revenue may show 62% prime cost at ₹4L — and that is your reality for the first 4-6 months.

Number 5: capex payback

Total capex (equipment + interiors + deposit + licences + working capital) divided by projected monthly net profit at steady state. Under 24 months is strong. 24-36 months is acceptable for prime locations. Above 36 months means you are buying a job, not a business.

Numbers 6 and 7: aggregator dependency and cash runway

If your location plan relies on aggregator for >45% of revenue, model commission (24-28%), packaging (8-9%), and refunds (2-3%) into variable cost rate. Cloud kitchen formats can sustain this; dine-in restaurants cannot without a dine-in volume plan. Working capital below 2.5 months of fixed costs means you will borrow at 24-30% in month 3 — budget for it or increase opening capital.

When to walk away

  • Any two red flags from the table above — one is negotiable; two is structural.
  • Rent load >15% — almost never works without an existing brand pulling covers from day one.
  • Break-even covers > kitchen capacity — maths doesn't lie; the site can't support the format.
  • Capex payback >48 months — you are paying for the landlord's location premium, not your concept.
Run the 7-number viability check →

More for you

Restaurant viability: 7 numbers before you sign the lease | Forkcast